Serrano & Serrano, LLC - Connecticut Lawyers - Accidents, Divorce, Social Security Disability, Immigration, Bankruptcy - Hartford 860 236-9350 * Waterbury 203 729-6100 * Toll-Free 800 856-6400

Connecticut Attorneys Summarize Recent Cases: Personal Injury, Family Law, Social Security Disability & SSI, Workers Compensation, Immigration, Bankruptcy, Criminal Law & DWI / DUI

Serrano & Serrano, LLC  -  Connecticut Lawyers  -  Accidents, Divorce, Social Security Disability, Immigration, Bankruptcy - Hartford 860 236-9350 * Waterbury 203 729-6100 * Toll-Free 800 856-6400 header image

Time Limited Alimony May Be Ordered for Reasons Other Than Self-Sufficiency

March 25th, 2009 No Comments

   For Family Law Help Click This Line 

Case:  Utz v. Utz (AC 28780) February 2009

Court:  Connecticut Appellate Court

Trial Court:  Norwich

Synopsis:  Although a divorce court may order time-limited alimony to allow a spouse to support herself while she re-enters the job market, a court may order such alimony for other reasons.  Thus it was not error to award weekly alimony of $1000 to a wife even if that amount did not provide her with any incentive to become employed.

Case Link:  http://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP112/112AP151.pdf

Tags:   · · ·

Gay marriage approved.

October 14th, 2008 No Comments

   For Family Law Help Click This Line 

Case:  Kerrigan v. Cmmr. of Public Health (SC 17718) 2008

Court:  Connecticut Supreme Court

Synopsis:  Allowing heterosexuals to marry but homosexuals only to enter civil unions creates a cognizable harm under the Connecticut State Constitution due to the pernicious discrimination gay men and lesbians face and because marriage carries a status and significance that civil unions do not.  Classifications based on sexual orientation constitute a quasi-suspect classification for purposes of the equal protection provisions of the State Constitution, thus making statutes that discriminate against gays subject to heightened or intermediate judicial scrutiny.  The state has provided insufficient justification for barring same sex couples from marrying.

Case Link:  http://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR289/289CR152.pdf

Tags:   ·