Case: Perricone v. Perricone (SC 17683) June 2009
Court: Connecticut Supreme Court
Trial Court: New Haven
Synopsis: The parties entered into a confidentiality agreement during their divorce. The separation agreement for the divorce did not include the separation agreement. After the divorce, the wife argued that the confidentiality agreement was no longer in force because it was not included in the separation agreement. The Supreme Court disagreed, stating it would have been “highly improbable” that the parties, upon dividing their property, intended to reduce the value of their property by exposing the husband’s business immediately to the harm that the agreement was intended to prevent.
Case Link: http://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR292/292CR78.pdf
Case Citation: 292 Conn. 187, 972 A.2d 666 (2009)
Tags: divorceNo Comments
0 responses so far ↓