Serrano & Serrano, LLC - Connecticut Lawyers - Accidents, Divorce, Social Security Disability, Immigration, Bankruptcy - Hartford 860 236-9350 * Waterbury 203 729-6100 * Toll-Free 800 856-6400

Connecticut Attorneys Summarize Recent Cases: Personal Injury, Family Law, Social Security Disability & SSI, Workers Compensation, Immigration, Bankruptcy, Criminal Law & DWI / DUI

Serrano & Serrano, LLC  -  Connecticut Lawyers  -  Accidents, Divorce, Social Security Disability, Immigration, Bankruptcy - Hartford 860 236-9350 * Waterbury 203 729-6100 * Toll-Free 800 856-6400 header image

Entries Tagged as 'Civil Procedure'

A Defendant Who Fails To Cure The Reason For A Disciplinary Default Cannot Defend On The Merits During The Hearing In Damages.

February 20th, 2009 No Comments

   For Legal Help Click This Line 

Case:  Peterson v. Woldeyohannes (AC 28650) December 2008

Court:  Connecticut Appellate Court

Trial Court:  Hartford

Synopsis:  A defendant who was defaulted for not responding to discovery should be prevented from filing a notice of defense and from presenting defenses to the underlying claims of liability.

Case Link:  http://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROap/AP111/111AP62.pdf

Tags:  

Judgment Lien Valid Despite Failing to State Original Judgment Amount

January 17th, 2009 No Comments

   For Foreclosure Help Click This Line 

Case:  PNC Bank v. Kelepecz (SC 18129) December 2008

Court:  Connecticut Supreme Court

Trial Court:  Bridgeport

Synopsis:  Although Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-380a states that a judgment lien should set forth the original judgment amount, a lien missing the amount is still valid because it provides sufficient notice to third parties of the existence of the lien, thereby satisfying the statute’s purpose.

Case Link:  http://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR289/289CR168.pdf

Tags:  

Abode service is valid even if the person is actually in prison.

September 12th, 2008 No Comments

  For Foreclosure Help Click This Line 

Case:  Argent Mortgage Co. v. Huertas (SC 18002) August 2008

Court:  Connecticut Supreme Court

Trial Court:  New Haven at Meriden

Synopsis:  A foreclosure complaint left at the home of a prisoner was upheld as valid service of process because a person may have more than one place of abode.  The court noted that the defendant’s children and the father of one of her children lived at the residence when service was made. 

Case Link:  http://www.jud.ct.gov/external/supapp/Cases/AROcr/CR288/288CR142.pdf 

Tags:   · ·