Serrano & Serrano, LLC

Attorneys at Law

800 856-6400

English 

Portuguese   

Spanish     

      Skill                            

   Determination       

                        Experience 

Home
John Serrano, Esq.
Gabriel R. Serrano, Esq.
Our Staff
Waterbury Area Office
Accidents
Bankruptcy
Business
Criminal Defense
Family Law
Immigration
Real Estate
Social Security
Portuguese Pages
Spanish Pages
Contact Us
Site Map

690 Flatbush Avenue West Hartford, CT  06110-1308

860 236-9350             800 856-6400  toll free     860 523-9101  fax

10 Church St, Naugatuck 203 729-6100

 

 

After the Divorce

    Entry of the divorce may not end the court proceedings between the parties.  The following circumstances may result in the parties returning to divorce court.  These proceedings after the divorce are referred to as post-judgment.

 

Disputes over Custody, Visitation and Child Support

    The law requires that family courts always be concerned with the best interests of minor children.  Because of this requirement, divorced parents can always return to court to seek changes in orders regarding custody, visitation and child support if the change would be in the best interests of the children.

    As children grow, their needs may change.  Sometimes these needs may best be served by changing child custody or visitation arrangements.

    The parties' income may change over time  If the change is substantial and was not expected at the time of the divorce, the court may modify the amount of child support.

 

Moving Out-of-State with the Children

  A divorced parent with custody of the children may want to relocate out of state.  The other parent (referred to as the non-custodial parent) may object to the move because it would reduce his or her contact with the children.  If the non-custodial parent challenges the move in court, the law requires that the custodial parent prove the following:

bullet

The relocation is for a legitimate purpose.

bullet

The proposed location is reasonable in light of such purpose.

bullet

The relocation is in the best interests of the children.

    The law also requires that the divorce court consider the following factors:

bullet

Each parent's reasons for seeking or opposing the relocation.

bullet

The quality of the relationships between the child and each parent.

bullet

The impact of the relocation on the quantity and the quality of the child's future contact with the non-relocating parent.

bullet

The degree to which the relocating parent's and the child's life may be enhanced economically, emotionally and educationally by the relocation.

bullet

The feasibility of preserving the relationship between the non-relocating parent and the child through suitable visitation arrangements.

 

Modification or Termination of Alimony.  If the divorce decree awarded weekly or other periodic alimony, and the decree did not prohibit modification, either party may return to divorce court to change the amount of alimony or to end it.  Terminating alimony is often appropriate if the party receiving it has remarried or is living with someone as if married.

    If no alimony was awarded at the time of the divorce, neither party can return to divorce court and ask for alimony.

 

Fraudulent Concealment of Assets

    During a divorce, each party is required to disclose his or her complete financial situation to the other party.  Each party is also required to use his or her best efforts to discover the other party's financial situation.

    A party who discovers after the divorce that the other party hid assets or income may be able to return to divorce court and request that the judgment be opened for new financial orders that take into account the newly discovered information.  An attempt to open a judgment on the basis of fraud should be made as soon as possible.  It is very likely that a court will deny a motion to open a judgment if it is not filed within 4 months of the discovery of the fraud.

    Courts do not like to open judgments.  The party seeking the new orders will have to prove to the divorce court that he or she was prevented from discovering the hidden assets or income because the other party committed fraud   — for example, lied under oath or secretly transferred assets in violation of the automatic orders.

    To open a judgment, there must be:

bullet

Clear proof of fraud or perjury (lying under oath or intentionally presenting a false sworn financial affidavit).

bullet

No unreasonable delay in seeking to open the judgment after the fraud was discovered.

bullet

A substantial likelihood that the result of a new trial would be different.

bullet

Proof that the party trying to open the judgment believed and relied upon the fraudulently misrepresented information.

 

When You Need a Divorce Lawyer,

Rely on Us for Skill, Determination and Experience.

 

Please note that our website is designed to provide only general legal information.

This information is not intended to apply to individual cases.

If you have a legal matter, you should speak with and hire an attorney to handle your specific situation.